Call Us: 240.462.3599

May-24: Can Higher Mortgage Rates Cause Rent Inflation? (Section III, Forecasts)

16 May 2024

 

Can Higher Mortgage Rates Cause Rent Inflation?​​ 

(Section III, Forecasts)

Over the 12 months ending Mar-24, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased 3.2%, energy prices increased 2.1% and commodity prices fell by 0.7%. Core CPI rose 3.80% from a year ago (see Table 1) ​​and is still above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

A screenshot of a graph

Description automatically generated

The U.S. rental market is still running too hot.​​ The BLS is trying to measure monthly aggregate personal expenditures on housing. The BLS measures housing costs using its “cost of shelter”.​​ 

The CPI cost of shelter is essentially the sum of two components: The first, is a measure of the rents paid by apartment tenants in multi-unit structures for their primary residences. This measure is called CPI rent (also called tenants’ rent, or rent of primary residence). The second is an estimate of the​​ rent that owner-occupied housing could command called Owners’ Equivalent Rent (OER). These measures tend to move together as the OER of a specific owner-occupied unit is estimated in part by observed actual rents on similar types of properties. Owner equivalent​​ rent, tenant’s rent and combined shelter represent 29.9 percent, 9.6 percent and a total 42​​ percent​​ of core CPI, respectively.​​ In Table 1, shelter increases by 5.65% in Mar-24.​​ 

 

The OER is a value calculated by the BLS from a survey and is reported with a significant time lag. Table 2 shows the correlation of OER with lagged mortgage rates during a 16 month window of Nov-22 through Feb-24. During that period of a very tight housing markets, and three years after mortgage rate changes, higher mortgage rates, counter-intuitively, drove rent inflation higher. The positive correlation between mortgage rates and the YOY change in OER in the third year after mortgage rates have increased in Chart 3 is above 90%.

A screenshot of a table

Description automatically generated

 

Since renters do not take out a mortgage, why is there such a strong relationship between mortgage rates and both OER and Tenants Rent? I will first, immediately below, attempt to explain the delayed but very strong relationship between mortgage rates and the two BLS data series using market data from two data venders. At the bottom of this report, I discuss how/why mortgages rates impact rental markets.

 

Table 3 shows the correlation of rent appreciation on three bedroom single family residential (SFR) properties with mortgage rates at nine different lags. The data on YOY change in rents of SFR 3 bedroom properties in Table 3 comes from Altisource.com. I am using an average rent appreciation on 20 different CBSAs vis-à-vis lagged mortgage rates.​​ 

A table with numbers and a few words

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

In the window of time from Nov-22 to Feb-24, the positive correlation between mortgage rates and rent appreciation for three bedroom properties for the 20-CBSAs lagged 18 months in our sample was 70%. Thus, higher mortgage rates in the 18 months before Nov-22 resulted in higher rent appreciation.

 

Taking the connection between market data and the national OER data reported by the BLS one step further, in Table 4 I shows the correlation of national changes in OER with rents appreciation on three bedroom SFR properties at different lags.​​ 

A screenshot of a graph

Description automatically generated

The highest correlation between OER and the 20-CBSA average of rent appreciation for 3 bedroom properties is 0.90 (at lag 18 months). The survey process used by the BLS results in OER being reported with a lag vis-à-vis Altisource.com which collects the median rents in each city each month. This is true because the BLS takes a massive, nationwide, rolling sample of housing units, splits them into panels, and then surveys each panel once every six months. The data then must be cleaned, checked, and matched to the same property twelve months earlier. They then take an average rent and a one month year-over-year change of that average. The surveying process essentially delays reporting changes in market conditions.​​ 

 

If we take the 18 months for mortgage rate changes to be fully realized by rental markets data for three bedroom properties from Altisource.com (RRA3bd) from Table 3 and then add to it the 18 months from Table 4 for the OER reported by the BLS to realizes this market information we can understand the 36 month lag between mortgage rates and OER in Table 2.​​ 

 

The delay caused by the BLS methodology suggests using an 18 month lag on actual reported rent appreciation by Altisource.com to project OER. We do this in Chart 1P. The dotted line in Chart 1P (a projection) shows data for​​ OER and a projection of possible future values of OER if it continues to track Altisource’s 3 bedroom rent values. ​​ The YOY OER rent reported by BLS for Feb-24 was 5.97% (shelter came in a 5.74% in Table 1). The actual YOY 20-CBSA average rent appreciation reported by Altisource.com for Feb-24 was 5.06%.​​ 

A graph of a number of houses

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

If we project this 5.06% and the other historical RRAs forward 18 months, we get Chart 1P. The dotted line is the year-over-year percentage change in rents on three-bedroom properties (RRA3bd) for the 20 CBSAs tracked by the CHTR lagged 18 months. The far-right observation of the dotted line is the 5.06%. Using historical rent appreciation rates of three bedroom properties from Feb-24 (5.06%) as a measure of OER and also shelter (from Table 1) for Aug-25, we can see the problem facing the Federal Reserve – rent appreciation does not slow down to the 2.0 percent target of the Federal Reserve.​​ 

 

We perform a similar exercise for Tenants Rents using YOY Zillow rent appreciation for apartments of all bedroom sizes in multi-unit structures and Altisource.com data for 1 bedroom apartments. Table 5 shows the correlation between YOY change in Tenants Rent as reported by the BLS and YOY change in the 12-CBSA average rent appreciation for both data series.

A white sheet with black text

Description automatically generated

Both data series with a 12-month lag are good leading indicators of YOY changes in Tenant’s rent. Using this information, Chart 2P shows a forecasted relationship between rent appreciation for apartments in multi-unit structures tracked by Zillow.com and the BLS’s tenants’ rent in CPI. ​​ The lag between the two is much shorter than for OER (here about 12 months using the correlations from Table 5, versus 18 from Table 3), and the variation is less than between OER and RRA3bd.​​ 

 

Rent appreciation has slowed considerably in the last year as new multifamily apartment buildings have come online in several southern cities. Yet the data shows YOY RRAapt has rebounded in the last few months. The point of Chart 1.P (and Chart 2.P) is that CPI Shelter is going to remain high in the second half of 2024.

A graph of a graph showing a line graph

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

 

 

Why higher interest rates might cause rent appreciation to accelerate 36 months later?

 

In a recent paper, Dias and Duarte (2019) find that, in contrast to house prices,​​ housing rents increase after a contractionary monetary policy shock.​​ This finding was corroborated by Haidorfer (2024). Dias and Duarte conjecture that it is reasonable to expect that all nominal prices of goods and services (rents included) should decline (or at least not increase) after a​​ contractionary monetary policy shock. However, this is not what they find. They posit that monetary policy affects the housing tenure decisions — own versus rent. They argue “If both the supply of housing for rental and of housing for ownership are inelastic in the short run, and there is limited convertibility between homes for sale and homes for rent, when interest rates go up, mortgage rates rise, and the cost of homeownership increases. As homeownership costs rise, the demand for rental housing also increases, and, as a result, housing rents rise.” ​​ Table 2 (page 2) shows this pattern -- following higher mortgage rates 18 months earlier, rent appreciation quickens. At that subsequent point, there is higher demand for rental properties. Residential construction can increase the supply of apartments in the near short-run, but this is not true for single family residential properties. In most major cities in the U.S., the available supply of buildable land has nearly peaked. The supply of SFR properties is very inelastic.

 

This larger variation in apartment rents that occurred during the pandemic, (Chart 1.p versus 2.p) occurred for two reasons: (1) The renter population experienced high turnover. Landlords were able to raise the rents on new tenants moving into an apartments. (2) Many apartment renters do not have signed leases. Landlords were able to charge more for the same apartment and renters had few choices.​​ 

 

Bibliography

Dias, Daniel A. and João B. Duarte (2019) “Monetary Policy, Housing Rents and Inflation Dynamics”. International Finance Discussion Papers 1248.

 

Haidorfer, Anton (2024) “The Dynamic Impact of Monetary Policy Over Short Horizons on Local Rental Markets”, Submitted to the AREUEA 2014 June conference.​​ 

 

2

May-24: Can Higher Mortgage Rates Cause Rent Inflation? (Section II, Empirical Tests)

16 May 2024

Can Higher Mortgage Rates Cause Rent Inflation?​​ 

(Section II, Empirical Tests)

In Sep-21 mortgage rates began increasing due to an increased demand to buy a home. Then in response to rising inflation, the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate by 25 bps on March 17, 2022. This took the benchmark rate from 25 bps to 50 bps. The federal funds rate currently is 5.50%. In June 2022, it began reducing its balance sheet gradually (known as quantitative tightening, or QT) by not reinvesting all the proceeds of maturing securities. Higher demand to own a home and this series of actions raised mortgage rates from 2.84% in Aug-21 to 6.78% by the end of Feb-24. What impact has higher mortgage rates had on year-over-year home price appreciation (HPA) and year-over-year rent appreciation for single family properties (RRA) in 20 cities?

The Center for Housing and Tax Research has​​ rental data​​ and year-over-year rent appreciation​​ for three bedroom properties going back to Jan-13 (rent_3bd and​​ RRA3bd). We can use this data to empirically measure the impact of mortgage rates on rental appreciation. First, we restrict the data to just rents on three bedroom detached properties and​​ initially​​ think of​​ the​​ mortgage rate (mortgage_rate) from a year earlier as being an important driver of those rents​​ and rent appreciation. Since renters do not take out a mortgage, why should we expect a strong relationship between mortgage rates and ​​ rent?​​ 

 

In a recent paper, Dias and Duarte (2019) find that, in contrast to house prices, housing rents increase after a contractionary monetary policy shock. This finding was corroborated by Haidorfer (2024). Dias and Duarte conjecture that it is reasonable to expect that all nominal prices of goods and services (rents included) should decline (or at least not increase) after a contractionary monetary policy shock. However, this is not what they find. They posit that monetary policy affects the housing tenure decisions — own versus rent. They argue “If both the supply of housing for rental and of housing for ownership are inelastic in the short run, and there is limited convertibility between homes for sale and homes for rent, when interest rates​​ go up, mortgage rates rise, and the cost of homeownership increases. As homeownership costs rise, the demand for rental housing also increases, and, as a result, housing rents rise.” ​​ 

 

To test this hypothesis, we might try to measure solely the impact of mortgage rates twelve months earlier on rent appreciation. To start, we can use a simple equation such as​​ 

 

RRA3bd = α + β L12mortgage rate ​​ + ε  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ (1)

 

The problem with Equation 1 is that over time other things will impact how rents are determined (other co-factors or confounders). In Equation 2, I have included other variables which would impact rental inflation.​​ 

 

RRA3bd = ​​ α ​​ + β1​​ L3RRA3bd + β2​​ L3HPA3bd​​ 

 ​​ ​​ ​​​​ + β3​​ L12RVP_3bd + β4​​ L12mortgage_rate​​ 

 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​   ​​ ​​ ​​​​ + β5​​ employment + β6​​ llordc_shr​​ 

 ​​ ​​ ​​​​ + β7​​ L12vacc + β8​​ dum_cov + ε  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ (2)

Here:​​ 

  • HPA3bd is home price appreciation..

  • RVP_3bd is the monthly rental rate versus the price of buying.

  • Mortgage_rate is the monthly average 30-year fixed rate​​ mortgage,​​ from Freddie Mac.​​ 

  • Employment is the year-over-year change each month in payroll employment,​​ from Bureau of Labor Statistics.

  • Llordc_shr is the share of properties that are rental properties in a city,​​ from Department of Census.

  • Vacc is the rental property vacancy rate,​​ from Department of Census.

  • Dum_cov is value of 1 from 2020-03-01 to 2022-12-01 and 0 otherwise.

 

Table 1 shows the estimated β4​​ coefficient​​ for each of 20 cities​​ using Equation 2 at​​ a lag of 12 months on the mortgage rate. I also show results​​ for other​​ lags on the mortgage rate. The cells that are highlighted indicate that my estimated coefficient was statistically significant. We see that for a lag of 12 months, or 15 months, in 11 cities, higher mortgage rates are followed 12 months later by statistically faster rent appreciation. Two cities had slower rent appreciation.

A screen shot of a computer

Description automatically generated​​ 

The point is that in some cities, when the Federal Reserve embarks on a contractionary monetary policy which results in higher mortgage rates, renters can and often do face faster rent appreciation twelve months later.​​ 

From the table above, in Chicago, IL, a 100 bps higher mortgage rate 12 months earlier causes rent appreciation to increase by 50 bps on average over the period of Jan-13 through Mar-24 (i.e., rents that were growing at 4.0% are now growing at 4.5%, on average) – a semi-elasticity of 0.5.​​ 

More specifically, in Mar-22, the 30-year FRM was 4.13% and in Mar-23, the 30-year FRM was 6.54%. This is an increase of 237 bps which potential homebuyer in Mar-24 in Chicago, IL would​​ have had to​​ confront (column 2, Table 1.b). Initially, both renter and landlords are constrained by the rent contract,​​ during the month of Mar-24,​​ they do not pay attention to the​​ mortgage​​ rates​​ of​​ Mar-24. In Chicago, IL the YOY rent appreciation​​ (RRA3bd) jumped from 5% in Mar-23 to 7.8% in Mar-24. This is an increase in rent appreciation of 280 bps (column 4) – a local semi-elasticity of 1.18.

A screenshot of a calculator

Description automatically generated​​ 

The survey process used by the BLS results in OER being reported with a lag vis-à-vis Altisource.com which collects the average of rents in each city each month. This is true because the BLS takes a massive, nationwide, rolling sample of housing units, splits them into panels, and then surveys each panel once every six months. The data then must be cleaned, checked, and matched to the same property twelve months earlier. They then take an average rent and a one month year-over-year change of that average. The surveying process essentially delays reporting changes in market conditions.

The faster appreciation shows up in the market data tracked by Altisource.com or Zillow.com 12 or 15 months following a mortgage rate change (but not in the BLS data). None-the-less, and more to the point, the rate of rent appreciation of these three bedroom SFR properties eventually feeds directly, albeit with a lag (an additional lag of about 12 months), into OER. OER then feed into core CPI. Thus, higher mortgage rates can drive rent inflation.

 

Bibliography

Dias, Daniel A. and João B. Duarte (2019) “Monetary Policy, Housing Rents and Inflation Dynamics”. International Finance Discussion Papers 1248.

Haidorfer, Anton (2024) “The Dynamic Impact of Monetary Policy Over Short Horizons on Local Rental Markets”, Submitted to the AREUEA 2024 June conference.

Oct-23: The U.S. Rental Market

31 Oct 2023

 

The 30-year fixed rate mortgage (FRM) ended on October 26, 2023, at 7.79%.​​ This is an increase of 472 bps since the end of Nov-21 when it was 3.07%. Concurrently, the year-over-year home price gain through Sep-23 for the 20 CBSAs tracked by this report (the CHTR 20-city index) was a positive 2.47% - slow but still positive (Column 4 in Table 1 below).​​ 

A table of numbers with black text

Description automatically generated

How long does it take for home price declines to filter into the rental market? This is an important question because rents filter into the CPI calculations and there is evidence that growth in rents on SFR detached properties appears to be a leading indicator of CPI-Shelter. The year-over-year growth in rents for 3-bedroom detached properties in Sep-23 was 6.48%. Given the long lag time for the rate changes to filter into the CPI data, this suggests the shelter cost of CPI is not going to fall below 4.00 percent anytime soon.​​ 

 

We also see in column 8 that YOY growth in rental rates on apartments in multi-unit structures is still positive and grew at a slightly slower rate in Sep-23 (3.27% vs 2.98 prior month). To get a micro-sense of how rents are changing with prices, Chart 1 shows the year-over-year increases in both home prices (HPA) and in rental rates (RRA) as of Sep-23 for our 20 CBSAs.

 

A graph of a number of bars

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

The chart shows that, across CBSAs, RRA does seem to move in-step with HPA. The clear bars with a horizontal line (RRAapt) are small positive values. As we move from left to right, the dotted bars show mostly negative changes and then they turn into positive increase in HPA across CBSAs. The red bars show the significant one month increase in rental rates for 3-bedroom​​ property and the much slower increases for rents on apartments in multi-unit buildings (which have turned upwards again). Higher mortgage rates have deflated the home price bubble, but not the rent bubble. It is important to note:

  • It can take three months for HPA to filter into RRA3bd and RRAapt, depending on the city.

  • Vacancy rates are low, despite the increased purchases of homes. Landlords have pricing power.

  • Apartment renters might have low incomes and weak credit and may have no other choices but to pay higher rents.​​ 

 

Individual CBSA rental markets and earnings:

A graph showing the amount of earnings

Description automatically generated

The still high appreciation of rental rate may continue. It depends, in part, whether renters can afford these increases and on the ability of landlords to increase rents in order to offset rising purchases prices for homes. The rule of thumb is that a household should allocate about 30 percent of its income to shelter. To partially answer this question, we show four additional charts​​ below. The first (Chart 2) is for three-bedroom detached properties and the second (Chart 3) is data for apartment rental (all unit sizes) in multi-unit buildings.​​ 

Chart 2 shows that in major CBSAs, like Los Angeles, CA, New York, NY, Miami, FL and San Francisco, CA renters are willing to allocate more than 55 percent of their earnings to renting a three-bedroom property.​​ 

This suggests that renters in other cities may continue to pay up to live where they are living or choose to rent a smaller property or move to locations where rents are cheaper.​​ 

But the rental markets are changing differently in each city. Chart 4 shows the changes in RVY for renting a 3-bedroom property from Nov-19 to Sep-23 (the same values as in Chart 2 are in the numerator). We see that in the cities on the right, renters are considerably worse off than in the time before the exogenous Covid-19 health shock.​​ 

Many renters are now paying more than 7.0 percent more of their income to pay their rent in at least four cities than they were in Nov-19.​​ 

A graph showing the difference between a number of people

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

 

The increased economic hardships now facing renters show up even more so in Chart 5. In that chart, we see that renters of apartments in 16 of the 20 cities that we track are now paying significantly higher rents relative to their income than they had been paying before the rates decline in 2020.

A graph showing a number of green squares

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

 

2

Sep-23: The U.S. Rental Market

06 Sep 2023

Aug-23: The U.S. Rental Market

15 Aug 2023

Jun-23: Rent Inflation and Market Data

30 Jun 2023

Jun-23: The U.S. Rental Market

08 Jun 2023

May-23: The U.S. Rental Market

08 May 2023

Jan-23: The U.S. Rental Market

04 Feb 2023

Dec-22: The U.S. Rental Market

19 Dec 2022